Ecuador vs Finland: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures over time
- Ecuador
- Finland
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 17 number against 17 number in Finland, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 44th and Finland ranks 44th of 185 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17 number | 16 number | 1 number | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 17 number | 16.6 number | 0.4 number | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures, Ecuador or Finland?
- Ecuador, at 17 number against 17 number in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures between Ecuador and Finland?
- 0 number, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Finland?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Finland rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures?
- Ecuador ranks 44th and Finland ranks 44th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The number of procedures records all interactions of the building company’s employees or any party acting on its behalf with external parties, including government agencies, notaries, the land registry, the cadastre, utility companies and public inspectors. Procedures that the company undergoes to connect the warehouse to water and sewerage are included. All procedures that are legally required and that are done in practice by a majority of companies are counted, even if they may be avoided in exceptional cases.