Equatorial Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures

Equatorial Guinea
13 number
in 2019
Sri Lanka
13 number
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
117th
Sri Lanka rank
117th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sri Lanka
051015200520122019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 13 number against 13 number in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th and Sri Lanka ranks 117th of 185 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2000s 13 number 14.2 number 1.2 number Sri Lanka
2010s 13 number 13.7 number 0.7 number Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures, Equatorial Guinea or Sri Lanka?
Equatorial Guinea, at 13 number against 13 number in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures between Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
0 number, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th and Sri Lanka ranks 117th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 2,740 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The number of procedures records all interactions of the building company’s employees or any party acting on its behalf with external parties, including government agencies, notaries, the land registry, the cadastre, utility companies and public inspectors. Procedures that the company undergoes to connect the warehouse to water and sewerage are included. All procedures that are legally required and that are done in practice by a majority of companies are counted, even if they may be avoided in exceptional cases.