Ghana vs Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures over time
- Ghana
- Guinea
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 16 number against 16 number in Guinea, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 63rd and Guinea ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16 number | 15 number | 1 number | Ghana |
| 2010s | 16 number | 15.4 number | 0.6 number | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures, Ghana or Guinea?
- Ghana, at 16 number against 16 number in Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures between Ghana and Guinea?
- 0 number, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Ghana and Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures?
- Ghana ranks 63rd and Guinea ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The number of procedures records all interactions of the building company’s employees or any party acting on its behalf with external parties, including government agencies, notaries, the land registry, the cadastre, utility companies and public inspectors. Procedures that the company undergoes to connect the warehouse to water and sewerage are included. All procedures that are legally required and that are done in practice by a majority of companies are counted, even if they may be avoided in exceptional cases.