Latvia vs Saudi Arabia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures over time
- Latvia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 14 number against 14 number in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Latvia ranks 96th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 185 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.8 number | 18.8 number | 0 number | — |
| 2010s | 14.9 number | 14.9 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures, Latvia or Saudi Arabia?
- Latvia, at 14 number against 14 number in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures between Latvia and Saudi Arabia?
- 0 number, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saudi Arabia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures?
- Latvia ranks 96th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The number of procedures records all interactions of the building company’s employees or any party acting on its behalf with external parties, including government agencies, notaries, the land registry, the cadastre, utility companies and public inspectors. Procedures that the company undergoes to connect the warehouse to water and sewerage are included. All procedures that are legally required and that are done in practice by a majority of companies are counted, even if they may be avoided in exceptional cases.