Latvia vs Tunisia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures

Latvia
14 number
in 2019
Tunisia
14 number
in 2019
Latvia rank
96th
Tunisia rank
96th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures over time

  • Latvia
  • Tunisia
05101520200520122019

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 14 number against 14 number in Tunisia, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 96th and Tunisia ranks 96th of 185 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 18.8 number 15 number 3.8 number Latvia
2010s 14.9 number 14.2 number 0.7 number Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures, Latvia or Tunisia?
Latvia, at 14 number against 14 number in Tunisia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures between Latvia and Tunisia?
0 number, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tunisia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Latvia and Tunisia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures?
Latvia ranks 96th and Tunisia ranks 96th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 2,740 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The number of procedures records all interactions of the building company’s employees or any party acting on its behalf with external parties, including government agencies, notaries, the land registry, the cadastre, utility companies and public inspectors. Procedures that the company undergoes to connect the warehouse to water and sewerage are included. All procedures that are legally required and that are done in practice by a majority of companies are counted, even if they may be avoided in exceptional cases.