Maldives vs Zambia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures over time
- Maldives
- Zambia
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 10 number against 10 number in Zambia, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 160th and Zambia ranks 160th of 185 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9 number | 11 number | 2 number | Zambia |
| 2010s | 9.5 number | 10.1 number | 0.6 number | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures, Maldives or Zambia?
- Maldives, at 10 number against 10 number in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures between Maldives and Zambia?
- 0 number, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Zambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Maldives and Zambia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures?
- Maldives ranks 160th and Zambia ranks 160th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The number of procedures records all interactions of the building company’s employees or any party acting on its behalf with external parties, including government agencies, notaries, the land registry, the cadastre, utility companies and public inspectors. Procedures that the company undergoes to connect the warehouse to water and sewerage are included. All procedures that are legally required and that are done in practice by a majority of companies are counted, even if they may be avoided in exceptional cases.