Statizoid

Comoros vs Equatorial Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (

Comoros
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Comoros rank
151st
Equatorial Guinea rank
151st

Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index ( over time

  • Comoros
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.20.40.60.81201420162019

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 151st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st of 183 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index (, Comoros or Equatorial Guinea?
Comoros, at 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index ( between Comoros and Equatorial Guinea?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Equatorial Guinea?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Comoros and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index (?
Comoros ranks 151st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 1,109 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.