Denmark vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index over time
- Denmark
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 137th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 137th of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index, Denmark or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Denmark, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index between Denmark and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index?
- Denmark ranks 137th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 137th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.