Equatorial Guinea vs Madagascar: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Madagascar
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Madagascar, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 152nd and Madagascar ranks 152nd of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index, Equatorial Guinea or Madagascar?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Madagascar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index between Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 152nd and Madagascar ranks 152nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.