Germany vs South Sudan: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index
Germany
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Sudan
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Germany rank
78th
South Sudan rank
78th
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index over time
- Germany
- South Sudan
How they compare
Germany currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in South Sudan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Germany ranks 78th and South Sudan ranks 78th of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index, Germany or South Sudan?
- Germany, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index between Germany and South Sudan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Germany and South Sudan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index?
- Germany ranks 78th and South Sudan ranks 78th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.