Hong Kong vs North Macedonia: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index over time
- Hong Kong
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index, Hong Kong or North Macedonia?
- Hong Kong, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index between Hong Kong and North Macedonia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and North Macedonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and North Macedonia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index?
- Hong Kong ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.