Hungary vs Luxembourg: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index
Hungary
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Luxembourg
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hungary rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index over time
- Hungary
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index, Hungary or Luxembourg?
- Hungary, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Luxembourg as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index between Hungary and Luxembourg?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Luxembourg?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hungary and Luxembourg rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index?
- Hungary ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.