Kazakhstan vs Malaysia: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index
Kazakhstan
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
1st
Malaysia rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index over time
- Kazakhstan
- Malaysia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index, Kazakhstan or Malaysia?
- Kazakhstan, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index between Kazakhstan and Malaysia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malaysia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Malaysia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index?
- Kazakhstan ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.