South Korea vs Lithuania: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (

South Korea
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Lithuania
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Korea rank
1st
Lithuania rank
1st

Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index ( over time

  • South Korea
  • Lithuania
01234201420162019

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Lithuania, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lithuania ahead.

South Korea ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 183 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index (, South Korea or Lithuania?
South Korea, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index ( between South Korea and Lithuania?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Lithuania?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do South Korea and Lithuania rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index (?
South Korea ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 1,109 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.