Malawi vs New Zealand: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index
Malawi
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malawi rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index over time
- Malawi
- New Zealand
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index, Malawi or New Zealand?
- Malawi, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index between Malawi and New Zealand?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and New Zealand rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index?
- Malawi ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.