Malaysia vs Taïwan: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index
Malaysia
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Taïwan
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia rank
1st
Taïwan rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index over time
- Malaysia
- Taïwan
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Taïwan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Taïwan has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Taïwan ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index, Malaysia or Taïwan?
- Malaysia, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Taïwan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index between Malaysia and Taïwan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Taïwan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Taïwan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Taïwan ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.