New Zealand vs Zambia: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index
New Zealand
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Zambia
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index over time
- New Zealand
- Zambia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index, New Zealand or Zambia?
- New Zealand, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index between New Zealand and Zambia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Zambia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Zambia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.