South Africa vs Taiwan: Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index
South Africa
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Taiwan
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa rank
1st
Taiwan rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index over time
- South Africa
- Taiwan
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Taiwan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Taiwan has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index, South Africa or Taiwan?
- South Africa, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Taiwan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index between South Africa and Taiwan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Taiwan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Taiwan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: professional certifications index?
- South Africa ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Professional certifications index (0-4) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The professional certifications index evaluates professional certi?cation requirements. It has two components: (i) the qualification requirements of the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with the building regulations; and (ii) the qualification requirements of the professional who conducts the technical inspections during construction. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.