Austria vs Canada: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Austria
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Canada
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Austria rank
1st
Canada rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Austria
- Canada
How they compare
Austria currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Canada, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 1st and Canada ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Austria or Canada?
- Austria, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Canada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Austria and Canada?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Canada?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Canada rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Austria ranks 1st and Canada ranks 1st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.