Cape Verde vs Malaysia: Dealing with construction: Quality control after
Cape Verde
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
1st
Malaysia rank
1st
Dealing with construction: Quality control after over time
- Cape Verde
- Malaysia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Cape Verde or Malaysia?
- Cape Verde, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Cape Verde and Malaysia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Malaysia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Malaysia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Cape Verde ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.