Cambodia vs East Timor: Dealing with construction: Quality control after
Cambodia
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
East Timor
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cambodia rank
135th
East Timor rank
135th
Dealing with construction: Quality control after over time
- Cambodia
- East Timor
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in East Timor, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 135th and East Timor ranks 135th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Cambodia or East Timor?
- Cambodia, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Cambodia and East Timor?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and East Timor?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and East Timor rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Cambodia ranks 135th and East Timor ranks 135th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.