Canada vs Finland: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Canada
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Finland
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Canada rank
1st
Finland rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Canada
- Finland
How they compare
Canada currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Finland, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 1st and Finland ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Canada or Finland?
- Canada, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Canada and Finland?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Finland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Canada and Finland rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Canada ranks 1st and Finland ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.