Chile vs Iceland: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Chile
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Iceland
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
1st
Iceland rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Chile
- Iceland
How they compare
Chile currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Iceland, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Chile or Iceland?
- Chile, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Chile and Iceland?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iceland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Iceland rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Chile ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.