Congo vs Suriname: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Congo
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Suriname
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Congo rank
134th
Suriname rank
134th
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Congo
- Suriname
How they compare
Congo currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Suriname, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 134th and Suriname ranks 134th of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Congo or Suriname?
- Congo, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Congo and Suriname?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Congo ranks 134th and Suriname ranks 134th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.