Cote d'Ivoire vs Guinea: Dealing with construction: Quality control after
Cote d'Ivoire
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Guinea
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
135th
Guinea rank
135th
Dealing with construction: Quality control after over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Guinea
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Guinea, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 135th and Guinea ranks 135th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Cote d'Ivoire or Guinea?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 135th and Guinea ranks 135th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.