Denmark vs New Zealand: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Denmark
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Denmark
- New Zealand
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Denmark or New Zealand?
- Denmark, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Denmark and New Zealand?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and New Zealand rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Denmark ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.