Denmark vs St. Lucia: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Denmark
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
St. Lucia
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark rank
1st
St. Lucia rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Denmark
- St. Lucia
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in St. Lucia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, St. Lucia has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 1st and St. Lucia ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Denmark or St. Lucia?
- Denmark, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in St. Lucia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Denmark and St. Lucia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and St. Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and St. Lucia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Denmark ranks 1st and St. Lucia ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.