Egypt vs Latvia: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Egypt
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Egypt rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Egypt
- Latvia
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Latvia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Egypt or Latvia?
- Egypt, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Egypt and Latvia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Egypt and Latvia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Egypt ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.