Estonia vs Korea: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Estonia
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Korea
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Estonia rank
1st
Korea rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Estonia
- Korea
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Korea, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 1st and Korea ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Estonia or Korea?
- Estonia, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Estonia and Korea?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Korea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Korea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Estonia ranks 1st and Korea ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.