Ethiopia vs Lesotho: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Ethiopia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Lesotho, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 134th and Lesotho ranks 134th of 185 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Ethiopia or Lesotho?
- Ethiopia, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Lesotho as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Ethiopia and Lesotho?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Lesotho?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Ethiopia and Lesotho rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Ethiopia ranks 134th and Lesotho ranks 134th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.