Finland vs San Marino: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Finland
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Finland rank
1st
San Marino rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Finland
- San Marino
How they compare
Finland currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in San Marino, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Finland or San Marino?
- Finland, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Finland and San Marino?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and San Marino?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Finland and San Marino rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Finland ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.