Grenada vs Kiribati: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Grenada
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Kiribati
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Grenada rank
132nd
Kiribati rank
132nd
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Grenada
- Kiribati
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Kiribati, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 132nd and Kiribati ranks 132nd of 183 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Grenada or Kiribati?
- Grenada, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Grenada and Kiribati?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Kiribati?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and Kiribati rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Grenada ranks 132nd and Kiribati ranks 132nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.