Hong Kong vs Palau: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Hong Kong
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Palau
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
1st
Palau rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Hong Kong
- Palau
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Palau, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 1st and Palau ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Hong Kong or Palau?
- Hong Kong, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Palau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Hong Kong and Palau?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Palau?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Palau rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Hong Kong ranks 1st and Palau ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.