Jordan vs Mozambique: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Jordan
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Mozambique
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Jordan rank
1st
Mozambique rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Jordan
- Mozambique
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Mozambique, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 1st and Mozambique ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Jordan or Mozambique?
- Jordan, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Mozambique as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Jordan and Mozambique?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mozambique?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Mozambique rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Jordan ranks 1st and Mozambique ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.