South Korea vs Nepal: Dealing with construction: Quality control after
South Korea
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Nepal
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Korea rank
1st
Nepal rank
1st
Dealing with construction: Quality control after over time
- South Korea
- Nepal
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Nepal, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, South Korea or Nepal?
- South Korea, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between South Korea and Nepal?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Nepal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Nepal rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- South Korea ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.