Kyrgyzstan vs Malta: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Kyrgyzstan
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malta
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Malta rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Malta
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Malta, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Kyrgyzstan or Malta?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Kyrgyzstan and Malta?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Malta rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.