Malawi vs Nepal: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Malawi
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Nepal
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malawi rank
1st
Nepal rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Malawi
- Nepal
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Nepal, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Malawi or Nepal?
- Malawi, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Malawi and Nepal?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nepal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Nepal rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Malawi ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.