Malaysia vs Palestine: Dealing with construction: Quality control after
Malaysia
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Palestine
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia rank
1st
Palestine rank
1st
Dealing with construction: Quality control after over time
- Malaysia
- Palestine
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Palestine, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Palestine has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Palestine ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Malaysia or Palestine?
- Malaysia, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Palestine as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Malaysia and Palestine?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Palestine?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Palestine rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Palestine ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.