Malta vs Singapore: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Malta
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malta rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Malta
- Singapore
How they compare
Malta currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Singapore, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Malta or Singapore?
- Malta, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Malta and Singapore?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Singapore?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Singapore rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Malta ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.