Mauritius vs Moldova: Dealing with construction: Quality control after
Mauritius
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Moldova
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Mauritius rank
1st
Moldova rank
1st
Dealing with construction: Quality control after over time
- Mauritius
- Moldova
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Moldova, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Mauritius or Moldova?
- Mauritius, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Mauritius and Moldova?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Moldova?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Moldova rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.