Mexico vs Suriname: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Mexico
- Suriname
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 2.17 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Suriname, a difference of 0.17 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 133rd and Suriname ranks 134th of 185 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Mexico or Suriname?
- Mexico, at 2.17 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Mexico and Suriname?
- 0.17 DB16-20 methodology, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mexico and Suriname rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Mexico ranks 133rd and Suriname ranks 134th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.