Namibia vs Romania: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Namibia
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Romania
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Namibia rank
1st
Romania rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Namibia
- Romania
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Romania, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Namibia or Romania?
- Namibia, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Namibia and Romania?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Romania rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Namibia ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.