Norway vs Uganda: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Norway
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Uganda
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Norway rank
1st
Uganda rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Norway
- Uganda
How they compare
Norway currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Norway ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Norway or Uganda?
- Norway, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Norway and Uganda?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Norway and Uganda rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Norway ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.