Philippines vs Spain: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Philippines
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Spain
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Philippines rank
1st
Spain rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Philippines
- Spain
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Spain, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Philippines or Spain?
- Philippines, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Spain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Philippines and Spain?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Spain?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Philippines and Spain rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Philippines ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.