Romania vs Vanuatu: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Romania
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Vanuatu
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Romania rank
1st
Vanuatu rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Romania
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Romania currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Romania or Vanuatu?
- Romania, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Vanuatu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Romania and Vanuatu?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Vanuatu?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Romania and Vanuatu rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Romania ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.