Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Rwanda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
- Rwanda, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Rwanda ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.