Serbia vs Viet Nam: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Serbia
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Viet Nam
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Serbia rank
1st
Viet Nam rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Serbia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Viet Nam, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Serbia or Viet Nam?
- Serbia, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Viet Nam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Serbia and Viet Nam?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Viet Nam?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Serbia and Viet Nam rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Serbia ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.