South Africa vs Spain: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
South Africa
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Spain
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa rank
1st
Spain rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- South Africa
- Spain
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Spain, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, South Africa or Spain?
- South Africa, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Spain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between South Africa and Spain?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Spain?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Spain rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- South Africa ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.