Uganda vs Viet Nam: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Uganda
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Viet Nam
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Uganda rank
1st
Viet Nam rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Uganda
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Viet Nam, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Uganda ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Uganda or Viet Nam?
- Uganda, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Viet Nam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Uganda and Viet Nam?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Viet Nam?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Uganda and Viet Nam rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Uganda ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.