Finland vs South Sudan: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control before
Finland
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Sudan
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Finland rank
1st
South Sudan rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control before over time
- Finland
- South Sudan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in South Sudan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control before, Finland or South Sudan?
- Finland, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control before between Finland and South Sudan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Finland and South Sudan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control before?
- Finland ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control before construction index (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control before construction index evaluates quality control in the review of the building plans. The index measures whether by law, a licensed architect or engineer is part of the committee or team that reviews and approves building permit applications and whether that person has the authority to refuse an application if the plans are not in conformity with regulations. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.